Verses to an Institution

WHAT’S NOT LOST

 Something happens 
when there is an absence of
foundation
there is a direction chosen
where heart, intent, and desire, meet
        intuition—where
preservation meets development
meets community
to set a precedent
for instances in which the likes of
       MOMA follow suit.
 Architecture and ancient character 
conversing as if they’re
of two different tongues
but translation isn’t lost altogether—
       instead a romantic erosion
set in motion
a revival that was
and remains
inherently difficult.
Yet performed with grace 
and put in place
as Santa Fe Style,
Where seven sings of luck
like ceremony
like the planting of a seed
for means of interpretation
an authentic invitation
to the American avant-garde
What was once considered 
to be hopeless and backwards in ways
saw a change —
 a shift in the foundations 
a brown and round revival
one that danced toward an identity
worthy of development
deserving of preservation.
Development of value
preservation of meaning
and the sustained promise
of authentic existence
 abound—within these rounded 
walls,
in these echoed halls
with floors that ache
to speak—oh the stories they’ve heard.
 of creation 
expansion
collision
dialogue and growth.
 musings of inclusion 
a unique revelation
a gift in the desert.
 One of sand and mud 
earth and sky
and everything in between
the in between,
it’s where we find ourselves,
now.
As cultures have clashed, coalesced
coalesced, clashed
 Erosion, a term not quite 
fitting, unless we aim
to find the beauty in what is lost,
the treasure that is story,
that is song,
that is memory until memories are gone.
and so here,
striking are the instances
of remembering—
where we came from
who we are
where we’re going.
 100 years removed from this place in time 
what might we find at this particular site
what will have beautifully eroded
into a quest for something more
to be questioned
to be brought about in the idea of
beauty, of belonging,
of story and legacy.
 And where is that 
Santa Fe horizon, somewhere else?
Likely anywhere
and that ought to be just fine to those
who have walked these halls
 and shared in the 
creation
the construction
the preservation
of beauty
in
art as response
in motion,
in memory,
forever.
—Carlos Contreras

Note
This is the latest in a series of commemorative poems
El Palacio has commissioned from Carlos Contreras. He has also written “Along the Beaten Path” for El Camino Real (bit.ly/ecrpoem), “It Used to Be a Village” for Coronado Historic Site (bit.ly/chspoem), and “Communion in the Desert” (bit.ly/nmhmpoem) on the occasion of the opening of the New Mexico History Museum, among others.

A FESTSCHRIFT ENDING ON A DRAWING BY RICHARD TUTTLE

 Window-glance of lilacs on adobe, a 
       light breeze and sunlight
shivering thin shadows on the wall,
       tulips blading up
through loam and leaf-rot. From brush-
       stroke and trowel-slip,
 from windrow poplars leafing-out to 
        wind-dwarfed oak,
a shadowy yet lucid history—water
       rushing the ditch-mouth,
rose and lilac rifted alike with
       mountain light and thunderhead,
 with elk-bugle, bear-chuff, bolete and 
      chanterelle, the silent rift
between first sight and pounce, the
       lion shadowing the straggling lamb
like a painting that carries the heft of
       gold-leaf, of clay and wool,
 the arched stroke of horses, golden in 
       the mist-shrouded meadow.
We are like that newly-sighted woman
       oppressed by the vituperations
Of shadow, of color—the bugled blues
       and honking reds pressed hard
 against her eyes, her ears, purpling 
       everything—a blastula of color,
a fistula, a fist that whelms and
      overwhelms with newness
until the barest stroke of graphite—
       part line, part silence—tacks
 across a flat pond of lined paper, a 
       light hand on the tiller, buffeted
by chance, by the weight of sunlight
       on penstemon—a breath so
gentle now across the earlobe carrying
       just your whispered name.

—Jon Davis

MOONRISE OVER HERNANDEZ

 The baby never slept, and if she did
it was only for ten minutes at a time.
She wasn’t distressed, simply inquisitive.
She didn’t want to miss out on anything.
At dusk I walked her in my arms around the Plaza.
The moon rising above Picacho Peak pleased her, the star
over Loretto Chapel illuminating the narrow streets of town.
We climbed the softly worn stairs of the museum,
the uneven wooden floors giving way under my feet like a
       well-watered lawn.
She craned her head and stretched her arms toward the dark
        vigas of the ceiling
with its carved red and blue bulleted pattern.
In a narrow room painted the green of a young ponderosa,
she gazed at Ansel Adams’ photographs,
moved her eyes across the southwestern sky of his prints,
pointing to the small white speck in the black sky
rising over snow-capped mountains, the river village of
       Hernandez,
and said her first word, up.

—Elizabeth Jacobson

WHAT CAUGHT MY EYE

Would life be richer if the sunflowers blooming
Became tanagers and feathers flew out of the bird.
Maximilian yellow hit the George Bellows blue sky

I used to live below the abstract, adobe,
a tract house in the real.  Our field flanked 
La Mesita, inhabiting John Sloan’s masonite.  

Oh Georgia, You drew me, lured by a skull,
a blue feud. I arrived and found a pelvis
by the road, caught is what I know about bone.  

I ride this white painted horse home from the
“Rendezvous.”
My horse is in oil.  My horse is in alfalfa. 
A group from India passes between this life and my last.  

Two of them take illicit photographs
next to two Hopi dancing in bronze, 
a rattlesnake held in teeth

The man who donated his kidney strolls by.
Life always grabs me, rattle and fear,
Though my people rarely handled snakes.

Paint gasps for canvas.
We toss our lives back and forth, smile, 
Handle what we dare.

—Joan Logghe

This poem was previously published in The Singing Bowl
(University of New Mexico Press).

THE REHEARSAL

Thunderheads above the Plaza,
a stop, a start—
guitar and violin rehearse.
One of those days
when conversations can go wrong
but the violinist is barefoot and cheerful
in hot pink and kelly green
and the guitar player smiles adoringly.
“It’s fantastic!” comes from the audience.
Rehearsals are confusing,
as is life,
the same problematic measure
over and over
and how many times I’ve looked
at these murals—
St. Clare rejecting the worldly life
in Pre-Raphaelite fashion.

The crucifix reaches higher
than the Mayan priest’s staff—
these images speak of conquest—
and Christopher Columbus
dreaming of a schooner’s
red sails at sunset.

Then Robert Schumann
Piano Quintet in E-flat,
the poor composer
dying in the insane asylum.
Yet it seems so amazing
to be walking around needing only
a stringed instrument
to produce these notes.
The piece so familiar to my ear
yet essentially unknown.
Notes falling and falling and falling.

How each person
in the audience
contains an entire world,
remains mysterious,
even to themselves.
Sorrow, greed, opinion, accomplishment, secrets, lunch.
Who can walk down an avenue
in a great city and say—
I am complete.
Now the violinist is playing the cello!
Showing off or to prove a point.
And the cellist is laughing.

—Miriam Sagan

EARTH AND WATER

At home, though out of place, caught in a spell,
like Rousseau’s nude drowsing on her jungle chaise,
a numinous radiant-white outsize shell,
suggestive, slyly, of a desert skull.
Painted in reverse, on the back of glass,
at home, though out of place, caught in a spell.
In the first brushstrokes, fine as filoselle,
the details are laid down: wisps of snake grass,
a numinous radiant-white outsize shell,
camper in which itinerant undine could dwell,
at any moment to emerge and gaze,
at home, though out of place, caught in a spell
under the creviced juniper, the swell
of distant mesas, now iconic as
a numinous radiant-white outsize shell.
An echo chamber, like a villanelle,
through which the rhymes of desert seas can pass,
at home, though out of place, caught in a spell,
a numinous radiant-white outsize shell.

—Carol Moldaw

THICK TIME

 At dawn the Sangre de Cristos usher in slants of light;
all begins anew amid cool clean breezes
in the ancestral homeland of our relatives, the Kiis’áanii.1
 Yootó2 is resplendent in the clear morning:
piñon, cedar and juniper, low red hills
and huge cottonwoods along the river
and the Plaza glisten in the new day.
They are eternal witnesses.
 Near our home, the huge yellow chamisa are at their finest 
in the bright September days though we admit
our detour around them due to their boisterous scent
and loud bees feasting on their nectar.
The young chamisa are perfectly round and stately;
their still-closed blossoms eager to debut in a few weeks.
They emerged in exact proportion to nearby stands
of brush, cholla, yucca and sage.
 The crisp morning summons the sleek train 
that is piloted by a bright yellow/orange roadrunner.
The car carries tourists who talk loudly though seated
       together;
they are compelled to share their grasp of local food, cafes,
       shops and pueblos.
Sullen students lug huge bags down the aisle then sling
       them onto seats;
they are shielded by headphones and pause only to tap
       intense texts into the world.
 Solitary tourists keep watch on the landscape, snapping 
       pictures
of lone horses on the hills, the crimson bajada dotted with
       green brush
and lone billowing cloud. Near the depot, they take selfies
suddenly smiling broadly and unabashedly
at their outstretched hand. The sudden action momentarily
      startles others.
 Fridays on the Santa Fe plaza:
slight winds carry enticing whiffs of hot dogs, burritos and
      kettle corn.
 Bright balloons rise languidly above shrill wails and 
       outstretched hands.
On the verandas above, people sip cool drinks, dine on spicy
       dishes
or warm, crusty pizza. Their banter and laughter wafts
       across joining
the din of children running about, that tall guy talking
       boldly into his phone
and the teenagers huddled on the grass sharing smoke
their hushed voices punctuated by occasional whoops of laughter.
 The huge, leafy cottonwoods regard the stooped elder who 
       treads warily;
she pauses to watch the children carelessly bound ahead.
       She smiles
and recalls those delicious days when she too was light and
       untethered.
 Ecstatic little dogs struggle to sniff every inch while minding 
       their “good dog”
status lest they are picked up. It’s torture to be carried in
       such a delectable place!
 Near the Obelisk, a busker strums guitar while silently pleading 
for another bill, or better yet, a fiver. As graying hair falls over
his bowed face, he recalls the long-gone years of dim smoky
       bars,
rowdy laughter, fanciful undying camaraderie, cold sweaty
        cans of beer
and that huge clear bowl stuffed with bills.
“Ah, Kentridge, the residue of the past is very much with
       us,”3
he says to himself and smiles.
 At the museum, my footsteps creak on the worn wooden floor,
Along the court yard pink hollyhocks and cerise roses
are radiant against the thick earthen walls.
The portals play annual hosts to strands of shiny, fresh ristras;
their deep, red iridescence a celebrated contrast to turquoise
       skies.
 Inside the dim museum, security guards politely shush 
       patrons,
whisper restroom directions then move about silently.
I wander through the halls and consider lines, colors,
angles of light and time conceits in varied works as
Maria Martinez, Scholder, Houser, Rembrandt and Picasso.
The echo of each scribble, line, stroke of pen, brush or yucca
       leaf
gesture from each frame, from decades, and centuries ago.
 Later, I sit beside the Santa Fe river where the fluttering 
       cottonwoods
evoke my ancestors’ long-ago journey to Yootó.
In the mid-1860s, the Diné were rounded up by the U.S. Army.
They were to be imprisoned at Fort Sumner,
but were first marched through Santa Fe to quell fears
about “marauding” Navajos and Apaches.
To the capturers’ surprise, the townspeople attacked the weary
disheveled children, elders and families.
They threw sticks, rocks and some even kicked and struck them.
Alarmed, the military formed a protective circle around them
then finally led them southward on the 200-mile walk to
       Ft. Sumner.
The Diné were held there for four years then released in 1868.
In the afternoon din, I stretch my arms
and straighten my back: a reminder to maintain posture.
 I see myself as others might: a Diné woman alone in Santa Fe
though I am bequeathed again with prayers, songs, and memory.
I understand that the huge trees, the cold river, dark velvet
       mountains
and even the thick brown walls recognize me.
 They bid me to return so as to cherish our ancestors,
and the multitude of gifts that surround us.
We are bidden to remember their journeys
as we prepare for the days ahead.

—Luci Tapahonso

Notes

  1. The Pueblo people.
  2. Yootó is the Navajo name for Santa Fe, meaning a necklace made of beads of clear cold water.
  3. William Kentridge, Arc Procession 9. Lines of Thought: Drawing from Michelangelo to Now. New Mexico Museum of Art. September 2017.
  4. Diné means “The People” in Navajo.

THE REHEARSAL AT ST. FRANCIS AUDITORIUM

Xylophone, triangle, marimba, soprano, violin—
the musicians use stopwatches, map out
in sound the convergence of three rivers at a farm,

but it sounds like the jungle at midnight.
Caught in a blizzard and surrounded by wolves
circling closer and closer, you might

remember the smell of huisache on a warm spring night.
You might remember three deer startled and stopped
at the edge of a road in a black canyon.

A child wants to act crazy, acts crazy,
is thereby sane. If you ache with longing
or are terrified: ache, be terrified, be hysterical,

walk into a redwood forest and listen:
hear a pine cone drop into a pool of water.
And what is your life then? In the time

it takes to make a fist or open your hand,
the musicians have stopped. But a life only stops
when what you want is no longer possible.

—Arthur Sze

Arthur Sze (opens in a new tab) is the twenty-fifth United States Poet Laureate. Sze was born in New York City in 1950 to Chinese immigrants. He is the author of twelve poetry collections, most recently Into the Hush (2025), as well as the prose collection The White Orchard: Selected Interviews, Essays, and Poems (2025).

Carlos Contreras is a poet, painter, father, educator, and student. Contreras was a member of the Kellogg Foundation’s Inaugural class of Community Leadership Network Fellows. Having served as the Director of Marketing for the City of Albuquerque and Mayor Tim Keller, Contreras is also a nationally awarded performance poet, published author, and featured visual artist in the Albuquerque Museum’s permanent collection Common Ground. He the co-founder of Art on the Rio, a place for art and artists to continue to thrive, and a partnership opportunity for Albuquerque’s small business community.

Carol Moldaw (opens in a new tab) is an American poet and the author of seven books of poetry including Go Figure (Four Way Books, 2024) and Beauty Refracted (Four Way Books, 2018). The recipient of an NEA Creative Writing Fellowship, a Pushcart Prize, and a Lannan Foundation Residency Fellowship, she lives in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Joan Logghe (opens in a new tab) was Poet Laureate of Santa Fe from 2010 to 2012. She works at poetry and arts activism in community, off the academic grid in La Puebla, New Mexico. Joan began a life in poetry by volunteering at her children’s school forty years ago and has worked with children and youth as well as adults, ever since. Awards include a National Endowment for the Arts Fellowship, Witter Bynner Foundation for Poetry Grants, A Mabel Dodge Luhan Internship, and a Barbara Deming/Money for Women grant. Her teaching life has included Ghost Ranch Abiquiu, University of New Mexico-Los Alamos, Santa Fe Community College, Artworks, Santa Fe Girls’ School, CultureNet’s Poets-in-the-Schools, Santa Clara Pueblo Day School, and teaching workshops to the AIDS community. For twenty-one years, she served as Poet-in-Residence at Santa Fe Girls’ School. She is the president of New Mexico Literary Arts which aims to inspire & develop the imaginative use of language and to create opportunities for the integration of the literary arts with other art forms throughout New Mexico.

Jon Davis (opens in a new tab) is the author of six books of poetry, including An Amiable Reception for the Acrobat (Grid Books, 2019). He has received a Lannan Literary Award, the Lavan Prize from the Academy of American Poets, a Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Fellowship, and two National Endowment for the Arts Fellowships. He taught creative writing and literature for thirty years, two at Salisbury University and 28 at the Institute of American Indian Arts. In 2013, he founded the Low Residency MFA in Creative Writing at the Institute of American Indian Arts (IAIA), which he directed until his retirement in 2018. From 2012-2014, he served as the City of Santa Fe’s fourth poet laureate.

Miriam Sagan (opens in a new tab) is a poet, essayist, memoirist, and teacher. She is the author of more than a dozen books, and lives in Santa Fe, New Mexico. She is a founding member of the collaborative press Tres Chicas Books. She holds an MA in creative writing from Boston University and was one of the editors of Aspect Magazine. She has been a writer in residence at four national parks, Yaddo, MacDowell, Gulkistan in Iceland, and Kura Studio in Japan. Notable works include Commune of the Golden Sun (2024), Music for Monoliths (2023), and Border Line: 101 Haiku (2023).

The Secret Sanctuary

BY MICHAEL MILLER

The New Mexico historic property known today as Los Luceros has supported consistent human occupation for about 800 years, according to the archaeological record. Today, that occupation metric is miniscule: the ranger’s lodgings and occasional travelers who bunk in the guest house overlooking a rambunctious stretch of the Rio Grande.

(more…)

Gene Peach (opens in a new tab) has been photographing the cultures and landscapes of New Mexico for more than thirty years. His work appears regularly in magazines and books and has been featured on more than three hundred publication covers. Peach has published four award-winning coffee-table books and his exhibit Making a Hand: Ranch Children of New Mexico toured nationwide to fourteen museums.

Michael Miller was raised in Northern New Mexico. He was the founding director of the Center for Southwest Research at the University of New Mexico and director of history and literary arts at the National Hispanic Cultural Center. A writer and poet, he is the author of the award-winning book, Monuments of Adobe, and a contributor to Taos: A Topical History, the recipient of the Lansing Bloom Award. He lives with his wife, Antoinette, on their family farm in La Puebla, New Mexico.

Getting the Points

BY CHRIS CREWS AND C.L. KIEFFER

Saturday, October 21 is International Archaeology Day. For the past few years the Department of Cultural Affairs has celebrated this day with an open house from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Center for New Mexico Archaeology (CNMA). Last year, the focus was on maize, and this year, projectile points are in the spotlight.

(more…)

Chris Crews is an anthropologist specialzing in hunters and gathers of New Mexico and currently volunteers with the ARC at CNMA.

Dr. C.L. Kieffer Nail is the registrar at the Museum of Indian Arts & Culture, a division of New Mexico Department of Cultural Affairs. She previously served the department as the Historic Preservation and Interpretation Specialist for New Mexico Historic Sites. Kieffer has nearly two decades of museum experience in collections and exhibitions from previous roles with the Autry National Center, the Maxwell Museum of Anthropology, and the Wheelwright Museum of the American Indian. She holds a bachelor’s in anthropology from the University of California Riverside, a master’s in anthropology from California State University Los Angeles, a master’s in Museum Studies from the University of New Mexico, and a doctorate in anthropology with an emphasis on Archaeology from the University of New Mexico.

Happy Birthday, MIAC!

BY LYNN CLINE

It’s been thirty years since the Museum of Indian Arts and Culture opened its doors on Museum Hill. This year also marks the twentieth anniversary of the opening of MIAC’s permanent exhibition Here, Now and Always, and the ninetieth anniversary of the founding of the Laboratory of Archaeology. 

(more…)

Lynn Cline (opens in a new tab) is an author and freelance writer who has covered Santa Fe and New Mexico for The New York Times, New Mexico Magazine, Bon Appetit, and other publications. She’s the author of Literary Pilgrims: The Santa Fe and Taos Writers’ Colonies and Romantic Days and Night in Santa Fe, a travel guide. She has lived in Santa Fe since 1993.

The History Whisperer

BY CAMILLE FLORES WITH PHOTOGRAPHS BY MINESH BACRANIA

Renowned historian Thomas E. Chávez is a grateful, if reluctant, cultural champion. When he learned last year that he’d been nominated to receive the highest civil award that Spain bestows on a foreigner, and that he was to be inducted into the Orden de Isabel la Católica at the rank of commander for his exceptional contributions to US–Spanish cultural relations, he demurred, and decided to withdraw his name from consideration. 

(more…)

Camille Flores (opens in a new tab) is a career journalist and writer who lives in Santa Fe, New Mexico. She is the author of two books about New Mexico people and places, and is currently contemplating a third.

Minesh Bacrania (opens in a new tab) has established himself as an editorial and documentary portrait photographer with a deep connection to New Mexico and the Southwest after a decade-long career as an experimental nuclear physicist. He lives with his son in the mountains outside of Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Notching It Up

BY LAURA ADDISON

When Napa-based artist Freeland Tanner speaks about his work, he often uses the word beyond—beyond boundaries, beyond the box, beyond the original forms that inspired him to begin with. Indeed, upon seeing his elaborately notched and layered boxes and frames done in the spirit of tramp art, visitors to the exhibition No Idle Hands: The Myths & Meanings of Tramp Art are awestruck and say that they’ve never seen anything quite like Tanner’s work before.

(more…)

George Post (opens in a new tab) specializes in arts & crafts photography. He shoots pictures for a wide variety of craftspeople, most of whom sell their wares on the craft fair circuit.

Laura Addison is curator of North American and European folk art at the Museum of International Folk Art. She was previously curator of contemporary art at the New Mexico Museum of Art (2002–13), and is a frequent contributor to El Palacio.

A Tribute to a Titan

BY LAURA ADDISON

Lloyd Cotsen, the charismatic, longtime executive of Neutrogena Corporation from 1967 to 1994, passed away on May 8, 2017. One of his many legacies is the gift of the Neutrogena Collection to the Museum of International Folk Art (MOIFA). “Cotsen’s gift of more than 3,000 objects to the museum in 1995 has had a profound effect on the lives of New Mexicans and visitors alike,” wrote Khristaan Villela, MOIFA’s director, in an obituary for the Santa Fe New Mexican. “Cotsen came to the museum by way of his private curator, the late Mary Hunt Kahlenberg, who was tasked to identify a permanent home for the Neutrogena corporate collection.” 

(more…)

Laura Addison is curator of North American and European folk art at the Museum of International Folk Art. She was previously curator of contemporary art at the New Mexico Museum of Art (2002–13), and is a frequent contributor to El Palacio.

The Accidental Angel

BY MARIE MARKESTEYN WITH CANDACE WALSH

I truly believe that nobody ever really owns Los Luceros, but they might get their name on a piece of paper for a while. My own relationship with Los Luceros is a long and storied one, although I was never an owner. I am, however, a storyteller, and the stories are unending over there.

I’m originally from Savannah, Georgia. My friend Jim Williams, the subject of the book Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil, got me interested and involved in historic preservation. In 1978, I came to New Mexico with Dan, the man who would become my husband.

We moved to the Dixon area in 1979. His family goes back to the 1800s, in Tierra Amarilla. The house that is now Three Ravens Coffee House, and the house next to it, were built by Dan’s ancestors in 1885.

We went to see some of his relatives in the Española Valley soon after our move, and his aunt’s husband’s sister, Grace, told me that she had something to show me. She took me on a walk to Los Luceros. That’s when I first learned that Los Luceros, no matter who the owner happens to be, belongs to the community, and it goes against tradition to keep its community from respectfully enjoying the grounds.

As I stood in front of Casa Grande, my first thought was, “There’s a Southern mansion right here in New Mexico, made out of mud!” Then I noticed that it was empty, and had been vandalized. The carved wooden bancos in the grand sala had been ripped out. The sundial had been taken from the lawn. It had no functioning electricity or running water. Some of the windows were broken.

We decided to find out who owned it. It was, coincidentally, a man who had gone to law school with Dan.

He asked, “Would you be interested in living here until we sell it?”

I immediately said yes.

Poor Dan said no.

I told him, “Well, you can come and see me here, because I’m moving in.” He eventually came around; we moved into Casa Grande in 1980, after working out the details. He never regretted it.

At the time, I was studying at the College of Santa Fe, and working in its career development office. One of my responsibilities was to help former prisoners, who had taken college classes while in the penitentiary, find jobs after they were released. I asked three or four of them to help Dan and me with the restoration. We put new linoleum down in the kitchen, replaced the broken glass, and got the water and electricity running.

My time living there was one of the most incredible periods of my life. I’ve lived in the community ever since, for almost forty years, and I’ve gotten to know a lot of the local people. At least once a week, if not more, somebody would come by and talk with me about the history they had experienced there. I wish I had written more of their stories down. But I’ll share the ones I did capture.

Many of the stories I have learned came from becoming a permanent resident of Los Luceros and continuing to be involved with it. For years, I gave tours, telling Los Luceros’ stories to visitors. But I think it’s still one of the best-kept secrets in New Mexico. A lot of the people I met who live in this area, outside of the descendants, didn’t even know it was there. When it sold, I bought property adjacent to Los Luceros, a section that used to be part of it. The apple trees on my property are very old. Some date back at least 100 years. It is reported that the very first fruit orchard dating back to Spanish times was here—Romes, Jonathans, and more recent Red and Golden Delicious apples. I was so sad when my Pippin apple tree died—it was ancient. The man who helps me with the property now, his godparents were the Montoyas, who were the first caretakers for Mary Cabot Wheelwright.

I interviewed Bernie Montoya, the youngest of the Montoyas’ children, when she was in her eighties or nineties, not long before she died. The Montoyas lived in the little Victorian house on the property. It was built by Abel Lucero in 1902 when his father Lucas gave him a piece of land.

Bernie was Mary’s favorite, the only one Mary would allow to clean the upstairs as a twelve-year-old girl, or to be in the house when her friend Hostiin Klah [the noted Navajo artist, singer, and medicine man] was there. Bernie said that Mary, Hostiin, and Mary’s cousin Lucy each had their own drum, and they would play their drums together by the hour.

When Bernie’s father became crippled by arthritis, Mary sent him back East to get more advanced treatment than was available in New Mexico, but nothing helped. Mary also took Bernie and Hostiin out to Maine, to stay on an island where she had a house. Neither of them had seen the ocean before. Bernie lived with Mary in the main house and Hostiin lived in the boathouse for several months.

Women came out here and found freedom they never had back East. Mary first discovered Los Luceros when she traveled to San Gabriel Dude Ranch to ride horses. Joe and Mildred Posey worked at San Gabriel Dude Ranch, and she met Mildred there. Mary fell in love with the area and bought Los Luceros. After Mr. Montoya could no longer take care of the ranch for Mary because of crippling arthritis the Poseys came there to work for her in that capacity. Joe was a wrangler and ranch hand, and Mildred did many things. Part of the Montoya family remained in the Abel Lucero house, and continued to work there. Joe and Mildred lived in the Casa Grande.

Gilbert Vigil, whose father Max took care of her horses, told me how Mary and Lucy used to set out from Casa Grande and ride all the way to Truchas and camp out. Her longest horseback ride was 500 miles. She traveled with an entourage of wranglers. When she got older, she’d still go on long rides, but she’d take the train back and let the wranglers ride back with the horses. No matter where they were riding, at 4 p.m. she made sure that they stopped to build a fire and have tea.

Mary was never interested in farming, so eventually she hired Maria Chabot to be the foreman of the ranch. Chabot first met Mary when Chabot, at age nineteen, was hired by the WPA to photograph territorial architecture in New Mexico. She came to the Casa Grande, knocked on the door, and asked permission. They became friends. Mary had an interest in photography, too. When the locals found out that Mary could take photos, they would ask her to come and take pictures of their relatives’ corpses after they died.

At one point, Chabot was working for both Georgia O’Keeffe, overseeing the restoration of her house in Abiquiú, and Mary Cabot Wheelwright. For the longest time, neither one of those women knew that Maria was working for both of them. Chabot worked with the men, on the tractor, in the fields. She lived with a woman friend in a house just across the road from the Casa Grande. But when Mary was at Los Luceros, she insisted that Maria move into Casa Grande while she was there.

After Chabot inherited Los Luceros, she sold it to Charles and Nina Collier in the early 1960s. Juan Martinez and his wife Frances worked for them. Charles was very eccentric, and Nina was beloved by the whole community. Juan has since died, but he told me that he and Charles dug up graves inside the capilla (chapel), which had a dirt floor, because Charles was curious and wanted to see the remains. They put them back exactly where they were. Eliza and her husband, Luis Ortiz, were the last of the Luceros to own the estate (Luis’s mother was a Lucero), and they were buried in front of the altar, one on top of the other. In one of the corners, there are two more graves. There are other graves in there also. Mr. Collier put concrete on top of the graves after that. If Juan hadn’t told me that he saw those graves, we wouldn’t know. There’s no documentation that they’re there.

That eerie recollection brings me to the ghost stories, which have their place in the lore. Nina Collier spoke often of seeing a female apparition on the stairs. The favorite local story is the judge that paces in the small room upstairs. I can share my own firsthand experiences. In Casa Grande, there are narrow stairs that go up to the roof—ship stairs built by Mary’s carpenter from Boston. About halfway up, there’s a trap door that goes into the space above the ceiling, just big enough for someone to slither in on their belly. Mr. Collier used to come by, and one time he did so to show us.

This time, Dan was standing in the low doorway in the grand sala, and I was on my way to the roof. The trap door popped out, spun like a Frisbee, and landed at Dan’s feet. Gravity wouldn’t do that. Recently I asked Dan if he still remembered that. (We are no longer married, but we are still friends.) He said, “I’d never forget that.”

My other story took place during a three-day 4th of July celebration we hosted at Los Luceros. We invited family and friends to bring tents and camp on the grounds.

I was on the front portal; my back was to the road. Suddenly something spun me around and without intention, I yelled, “Stop!” Four people stopped dead still in the road. A huge tree limb fell right in front of them. If they had gone another step. Something used me to save those people. I couldn’t speak for a while after that.

The most recent scary story I heard was this one: Some teen- agers were trying to open the gate to Los Luceros late at night. A ghost appeared to them from behind a large lilac bush. This woman in white appeared and said in a moaning voice, “You must leave!” I had to laugh. At the time, I was staying in the Abel Lucero house while my house was being remodeled. That was me, in my long white nightgown, fed up with their shenanigans.

I have been a collector of Los Luceros stories, and after all of these years, it pleases me that I figure in at least one.

For more on the history of Los Luceros, read Michael Miller’s, ‘The Secret Sanctuary.’

Candace Walsh (opens in a new tab) is a former editor of El Palacio. Currently, she is an assistant professor of creative writing at Central Washington University. Walsh holds a PhD in creative writing from Ohio University and an MFA from Warren Wilson College. Candace has worked on staff at Condé Nast International, Mothering Magazine, and as the managing editor of New Mexico Magazine. Her writing has appeared in numerous national and local publications. Walsh is the author of Licking the Spoon: A Memoir of Food, Family, and Identity (Seal Press 2012), a 2013 New Mexico – Arizona Book Awards winner, and two of the essay anthologies she co-edited were Lambda Literary Award finalists: Dear John, I Love Jane and Greetings from Janeland.

Marie Markesteyn worked as a docent at Los Luceros Historic Site.

Survival of the Artist

MODERATED BY PETER BG SHOEMAKER & CONDENSED BY CANDACE WALSH

Peter: The Be Here Now collaborations are using the counterculture movement in the United States as their centerpiece, their lodestone. Herb, your exhibition of photographs focuses on your experiences and your fellow soldiers in Vietnam. Michael, one of the many remarkable things about your art is your perspective as someone who lost his sight while a soldier in Vietnam. Both of you have spent the decades since then building your careers, and bodies of work, as artists.

I want to start there. Both of you have been really open about your experiences in Vietnam and in those years before you found yourself in Southeast Asia. Both of you were drafted. Both of you had spent some time in college beforehand. Both of you were practicing your art. Can you talk about the culture you came from, how you thought about your place in it, and how that might have changed once you found yourself heading off, as my generation said, “into the suck”?

Michael: I was born in Santa Fe, lived in Taos from when I was in the fourth grade to sometime just before I went to Vietnam. Living in the north central part of New Mexico, the war seemed so far away and I didn’t think very much about it. On television, you could see all of the riots, the demonstrations and whatever else was going on in the larger cities. But out here, it was far away.

I was very much into hunting, fishing, and just having a good old life. I was in college and then left college. It was easy for me to be apart from that whole counterculture thing—the free love scene, people with long hair. The Hog Farm commune and others existed, and I didn’t think about any of it at all. I had no interest in it. 

One day, I received that draft letter that said, “Greetings.” I wasn’t too happy about it, but I wasn’t concerned about it either. Someone even asked if I wanted to go to Canada with them, and I said, “No, I couldn’t possibly do that.” I ended up at Fort Bliss, Fort Polk, Fort Knox, then on to Vietnam.

We were constantly told, “There’s a war going on. You may come back and you may not.” Of course, when you’re at that age, you think you’re somewhat immortal. From my perspective, I was definitely going to come back.

One day, I believe in Fort Polk, these two guys were training us on this map course. They were our age, but there was a hardness about them. They were different, and I couldn’t quite place what it was. Then suddenly one day in Vietnam, it struck me why those two guys were so different.

That moment occurred three, four weeks after I got there. We walked into this little village. I came up to this thatched hut and inside was this old man with this very long mustache coming down, and his white braid. He sat there in front of his table, he had a pitcher of tea and two cups. He smiled at me. I didn’t really want to go into the hut. He offered me tea, and he poured it and then he raised his hand.

Of course, you heard stories of getting poisoned, so I pointed at the tea and pointed at him and then motioned for him to drink it. He drank his tea and, of course, all this time I had my M16 pointed right at him. Then he poured it again, he offered it and I shook my head no.

I turned around and walked away. I thought, “Oh, my goodness, what’s happened to me? Where’s my humanity?” But I guess in that world you have to develop this screen to preserve your sanity, in order to survive what you encounter in those situations on a daily basis. That moment is when I realized I was now one of those two hardened young men.

Peter: Tell us about the world you were in, Herb, before you were called up.

Herbert: I grew up in a small Midwestern farm town in Illinois. My father’s family were German Lutherans, and they had left Germany to escape conscription. They were pacifists, the direct followers of Martin Luther. They came over to this country. There were no warriors in my family at all. They were totally unprepared to understand what it meant when I was drafted.

I was focused on school, was working my way through school at the University of Chicago and the Art Institute of Chicago, studying photography. I let my credit hours drop and I was drafted. I was unprepared. There were options. I wasn’t going to go to Canada and I wasn’t going to say that I was gay—even though I am. That didn’t seem to be an appropriate response. I did not want to try to be a conscientious objector, because it would have been a complicated, lengthy process.

It was an extraordinary time. Although I was going to school and working, I was part of the counterculture in Chicago. It was all going on around me. I had friends that were very involved in it because Chicago was very ahead of its time at that point, even more so I think than New York or San Francisco. While I was overseas, a good friend of mine was arrested in one of the Grant Park scrimmages.

Peter: Once you got to Vietnam, did you feel you were with people who had been part of that same counterculture that you were part of? 

Herbert: I don’t think so. Although I met guys that were somewhat similar to me, when you go through basic training, they basically strip you of your personality. You become part of this intimate body of men who work as a unit. All that other stuff loses some of its importance. It’s more about the journey, what you’re there to do. 

I landed in Long Binh. There was a swimming pool. There was an enlisted men’s club. I thought, “What is this?” I thought, this wasn’t bad at all. But after a couple of weeks I got attached to the 25th Infantry at C Chi. It was between Saigon and Cambodia on the Ho Chi Minh Trail, where the war was going on. I was right in the middle of it then.

Peter: For artists who spend their lives in creative pursuits, trying to find truth and get their own truth out there, war can be both enormously horrifying and enormously clarifying. It can strip away all that other stuff and really let you see. You’d already been doing photography, Herb. Michael, you’d already been thinking about and doing sculpture and, of course, came from a great pottery family. Did you begin to find something there that would define your work afterward? 

Michael: No, as Herb described, you became involved in this group of men and your identity was stripped. You don’t have time to think about other things, because from the time the sun comes up until the sun goes down, you’re out there in training, often into the night. 

The only time was at the very end, after I got wounded and I was lying there in the hospital bed, knowing that I couldn’t see anymore and only have one good hand. Then, I wondered, will I ever be able to work again as a sculptor?

That question kept coming into my mind in the evacuation hospital in Vietnam, and later on when I got to Japan. I asked for some waterbased clay and created an inchworm, a squirrel, and a very crude form of Rodin’s The Thinker. At that moment, I knew that I could do it, as crude as those pieces may have been. Unfortunately, they didn’t survive. I don’t know whatever happened to them.

The excitement, the energy suddenly was very real. Now, I knew what I was going to do with the rest of my life. It’s what I always wanted to do anyway, but now I had all the time in the world to pursue my art.

Afterwards, going through the VA process, meeting with social workers and psychologists before I was thrown out into the world again, everyone that I came across thought I shouldn’t even try to be a sculptor. They thought that I should go back to school and get my degree. I said no. I kept at it, and fortunately made it happen.

It was going to happen anyway, but not being able to see made me find a new way of going about the creative process. When you can’t see and you have one good hand, your world is all sound and touch. You walk into a room and in an instant, you can see everything, but when you’re blind, all you see is what the tips of your fingers see. Whatever you see and feel is just thousands of touches.

Peter: Herb, you shot the work in Sleeping During the Day in Vietnam. What was the role of that art in your time there? 

Herbert: I think I just simply felt like I had to document what was around me for some reason. Like what Michael said, you’re there as a soldier, not as a photographer. I was there as a radio operator, not as a photographer, but I had a camera with me and I continued to do the work that I had been doing earlier.

Primarily, my job was running this high-frequency communications unit. The photography was second. The business of being an artist, like with Michael—when he talks about his work—it’s very evident you can see his vision of the sculpture that he creates. It’s very evident to me how that comes through his spirit, his mind, his gift, and ends up in his work. The same thing happened to me. We’re given a gift. And then, it’s our job to follow that gift in life. I did that.

Peter: Yet, what you chose to document in the work that you were doing there wasn’t the standard journalistic approach to war, which tends to focus on the injured, the maimed, the warrior, and warring. Your work was very different.

Herbert: I think one of the things that I see now as an older person is that I was trying to photograph what was inside of everyone I’ve ever photographed. And I discovered at some point that what’s inside of them is inside of all of us. It’s that life, it’s that spirit of life. 

If you look at all the portraits of all the men, you pretty much see the same thing in their spirit. I’ve been photographing portraits all my adult life here. It’s the other information that can be interesting or fascinating, what you see surrounding that spirit, if that makes any sense.

Peter: I’ve spent some time thinking about the entwining of art and war that’s been going on since Achilles was on the plains of Troy. This is a long and important part of our culture. What makes one so close to another? What it is that draws artists to war as a subject? 

Michael: I believe people are drawn to other people because of common interests. Art tells a story. Art captures emotions, feelings, history. But, that’s the only connection I can make, because war and art are at different ends of the spectrum of the spirit of the man and the love of life. 

Peter: So I think what I hear you saying is that art is creation and war is destruction. Herb, do you agree?

Herbert: I’m not sure that artists are drawn to war. I think artists are everywhere, and when they find themselves in war, they do what it is that they do as artists and that is to present something that not everyone gets to see. If you have an artistic perspective, you observe things in a bit of a different way, then you try to put that into a work. 

Peter: As far as I can tell now, neither of you are explicitly referencing your time in Vietnam in your current work. 

Michael: That’s correct. I’ve only created one sculpture that goes back to that time period. I’m sure I won’t create another one. I don’t like that time. Of course, we all think about it. Every time I hear a helicopter fly overhead, the first thing I think of is Vietnam.

I’ll tell my story if asked, and I think it’s good that people do, but there’s also that understanding when you talk to someone who has gone through the experience of it all, there’s a very strong communication and understanding of that world.

Peter: Words only go so far. Returning from war is fraught. There’s inevitably an enormous gulf between those who were there and those that weren’t. There’s often a collective feeling on both sides of guilt, of misunderstanding, of confusion. I think that’s been true certainly since the Vietnam War and maybe even earlier than that. Do you ever get tired of a being asked these questions about your experience of Vietnam, your coming home, and your life after?

Herbert: No.

Michael: I don’t. I’ll answer any question. If someone wants to know something, and if they have the balls to ask, then I answer them. [laughter] How else does someone know? In a way, it helps to cleanse. If you acknowledge it, then perhaps you can help dissipate some of it by expressing it.

Peter: One of the things that I’ve experienced as a Marine and veteran of Desert Shield and Desert Storm, talking to the people coming back from Middle East wars, is that they’re very confused about the world they’re coming back into. There’s such divisiveness. There’s all this rhetorical support for them, “Support the troops,” which I think is a legacy of the experience of Vietnam. But they’re really confused because they come back to a world they are finding to be completely fractured. 

What did you think of America when you returned to it? Herb, I think you said that you had taken off your uniform before you came back.

Herbert: You said it. I wanted to hide that I was a vet. I went back to Chicago and could not put my life back together there. I only lasted about six months in Chicago. You come home changed. You come back as a different person. The loss of innocence is extraordinary as a soldier. You go in as a young man, the world looks this way, and then you see all of humanity and what they do to each other and it changes you. You have this total loss of innocence.

I think trying to walk back into the life you left is impossible. I don’t think you can do it. I see that’s where so many guys have problems now. I hear a lot about suicidal ideation and actual suicides. That was very prevalent in my time, as well. I found myself very suicidal, but thank God, I didn’t do that—close to it but not quite.

At first I became virtually homeless. I was an artist, right? [laughter] I lived in an old empty hotel on Clark Street in Chicago. All the homeless people lived in the stairwell. All the walls in this building had been knocked down. I stayed there for about four or five months and then I thought, I’ve got to get out of here. I was going to go back to the Southwest because that’s where I had done some training. Subconsciously, I saw that as a place that was safe before Vietnam.

Peter: Michael, did you know any other vets when you got back?

Michael: I had a friend who was in Vietnam, a very good friend, but as Herb said, it changes you a lot and it changes the way you go about doing things, and so he went his way and I went mine. We used to go fishing a lot prior to that.

It’s a whole different scene when you come back. I believe art saved my life because I knew I had direction. I also have seven sisters and two brothers, so I was coming back to a loving environment. My parents lived in Taos at the time. I came back to an art community, and I started making pieces. 

I was in the hospital for eight months. I got hurt the 8th of January and came home the 2nd of October. During that whole process, as I mentioned, no one thought I should or would be able to succeed as a sculptor Probably the only good thing that came out of my convalescence was that in the hospital, you’d just write, “Vietnam casualty” and you didn’t need to put a stamp on your letters home.

Herbert: I had no physical injury; it was just between my ears.

Michael: Our situations were very different. I’d be walking down the street, and people would come up and cry on my shoulder. Then when they’d walk away I’d ask whomever I was with, “Who was that?” Taos is a very small community. I lived with my parents for three months after I came back, and then I said, “I can’t survive if I stay here.” I found an apartment with the help of my sister, who lived in Santa Fe.

Peter: Why did you think that you couldn’t survive if you stayed in Taos?

Michael: Too much TLC. They wanted to do everything for me and there’s no way I would have been able to live. I wanted to live. I wanted to do things. I had to get out there and do them. When I told my parents, they said, “How will you cook?” “I’ll learn.” “How will you get anywhere?” “I’ll find a driver.” I bought a car and I found a driver.

Of course, I was still very much a young man. I slowly, somehow figured out how to go out on dates and that whole process. I just had to work at finding out ways to get things done. 

Peter: Herb, you said earlier that you’d come from this pacifist family and background. That essentially, the day you left for Vietnam, your parents had decided you were lost to them.

Herbert: I think so. Watching television at that time and seeing all the soldiers being killed, I think they just assumed I would get killed. I think they started grieving my loss the day I left. My parents had lost my older brother. When we were younger, he died, and I think that death offered them a place to understand what it’s like to lose a child. It was very easy for them then to put me in that same place—to believe that they were going to lose their next son.

Peter: Did you go home to them first?

Herbert: No. I stayed in California for a week or two, in Oakland. I just couldn’t go back home. Then, I went back to my partner’s place in Chicago and that didn’t work because he had a new partner. Then I went and saw my family. But we just couldn’t recognize each other. I think that over time, eventually, we worked it out. I moved to New Mexico. My parents came out probably in the mid 1970s, and everything seemed to start to heal. We got to have a pretty extraordinary relationship in that process.

Peter: You both had really different homecomings. What would you say to people coming home now? 

Michael: I strongly believe you have to find something that you love and set out to work at it, because it will save your life. It replaces all the negative energy that you brought back with you, the nightmares that go on for months. If you find something you can replace all those things with, then I think the healing starts.

Herbert: I didn’t come to terms with my pain for about twelve years. I hid my being a vet. Unlike you, Michael, I didn’t have any physical injuries, so I could do that. No one was asking me why I couldn’t walk or anything like that, so I could hide out fairly well.

In 1981, I was about to blow my brains out when the Veterans Center intervened. It saved my life. I called the vet center, and two guys came to visit me. I also got clean and sober at the same time. I started this whole process of understanding what was going on. I did not know I had PTSD. I had never even heard of it before.

In terms of guys coming back, I don’t know what to say. I’m in a weekly veterans group; we all have PTSD. We’re all Vietnam vets. We’re all in our late 60s, early 70s, except for a new guy from the first and second Gulf Wars. 

Michael: That term didn’t exist when we came back. I remember telling my older brother, “I need to talk to someone. I need to get rid of things inside and I need help.” He started laughing and said, “You’re the strongest person I know,” so I let it go. I knew I wanted to talk to someone, but that’s as far as I ever got. I guess time took care of that, somewhat.

Herbert: I hear about so many of these guys taking their lives, and I don’t know what the Army can do to make reentry safer. I wish I knew. I hate to see guys suffer this way. When you lose your innocence and you don’t have support, it’s very tough. 

Peter: The Iraq and Afghanistan veterans are suffering some pretty horrible, longterm, nasty, multiple deployment kind of stuff. I think that’s what’s destroying this generation: six, seven, eight deployments. 

I did a podcast at Northern Arizona University about eight months ago. It was recorded in front of a class of vets coming back from the Middle East wars, from Afghanistan, from Iraq. The class was designed to help them understand the world they’re back in now. It’s taught through the perspective of the humanities, and what we’ve learned over the last 8,000 years of living together as humans.

What I found with all these people is this enormous confusion. The military is a family. It can be a cocoon around your understanding and around what’s going on in the rest of the world.

Everybody’s homecoming is unique just like everybody’s war is unique. But there’s a commonality of discovering yourself and your world outside of the military. I don’t think the VA is doing a great job addressing it. As you know, there are self-formed veterans groups that are trying very hard to cut down on these suicides. They say, “Call at any time. We’ll show up.” They send three guys over. That’s making some difference, but it’s a problem, for sure. 

Michael: I think I’ve left it pretty much behind. The nightmares are gone. Other than that, I don’t like organizations or groups. I do donate sculptures to veterans groups. I was raised a great deal by my brother. We spent so much time in the mountains alone. I was very happy there. I didn’t have a lot of friends, because I just find that friends take energy. Several years ago, my wife, Laurie, said, “You haven’t been out of the house in seven days. You have to get out.” I was busy sculpting for seven days. I was having the best time.

Peter: Herb, you’ve been very open about your struggles with PTSD. I wonder what role your continuing practice of portraiture has played in coming to terms with your time in Vietnam.

Herbert: When I went for treatment the second time back in the late 1990s at the VA, they suggested that I print a couple of images every week. I went back into those negatives and I started printing them. After about a year, I had a pretty good body of work. That allowed some of that fear of that work to go away.

I live in isolation. I’ve never been able to live with somebody. To maintain the kind of intimacy that’s required in a marriage or a relationship, I can’t do that. I have to isolate. I can do it for two or three days and then I have to…I live in a bunker, basically, now. I come out and do the work, then I go back to my bunker. [laughs]

Peter: Behind your eight-foot walls.

Herbert: Behind my eight-foot walls. There I find safety. What Michael said about being indoors, working on his work, and you live your life pretty much by yourself, that’s the same thing I do.

Peter: I sympathize entirely [laughs] with the wanting to stay away from people thing. Michael, do you find your work to be therapy?

Michael: Absolutely. I love my work. As long as you focus on doing something you love, it grows. There’s nothing else in the world like it. 

Peter: Do you find that you have a place in contemporary culture? Do you feel like you’re part of the ebb and flow? 

Herbert: My work is somewhat archaic; I work with film. I have not taken any new photographs in a number of years. I’m working mostly with my old negatives, because there’s a big body of work that’s never been seen. That’s what I want to do while I’m an older person. I tried digital and I couldn’t do it. 

I’m an older person. I’m ready to go up to the cemetery any time. I’m not going to push it, but I feel I’ve done what I need to do. When you’re young, you get to see the future. Then, when you get to this age, you can’t see the future anymore. I just think that’s the nature of all humans. 

Peter:How about you, Michael? Do you feel part of the culture?

Michael: I get asked to go here and there to give talks about my work, or to have shows. I also have a wife. She needs people a lot more than I do. We occasionally go here or there. It’s easier to say no to things now than it was some years ago. We have two daughters, and we visit them. 

Herbert: I wish I could give more back to the younger vets. I don’t know how I would do that. I would love it if my experience could help them. You never know. Something may open up. I do know that my work has opened up some doors. I’ve seen people walking out of my little exhibit, weeping. It’s like, “Wow. They were touched by something that they saw.”

Michael: We started doing touchable exhibits, because I had so many fights with museums across the country about being allowed to touch things. We’ve had them in England and other places in the world. People come out crying, saying, “I’ve always wanted the opportunity to touch pieces. Thank you.” 

If I had a choice between sight and being blind, I’d take being blind, because you get used to it. If you’re happy and you love your life, why change it?

Herbert: I have been asked this question from some of my other soldier friends. If we had to do it all over again, would we? I was on a fairly accelerated success path when I was young, and I didn’t get that path. I got something else. I probably would not be living in Santa Fe, not have experienced the world I have here. I wouldn’t have been given all these gifts. I would have had a whole other life. I have the life I’ve been given, for one reason or another, and I just have to live in acceptance of it.

Peter: That’s the reality. That’s what we all have to do.

Michael: It’s interesting that it’s just one moment, here and there, that changes the directions of our lives. I could have stayed in basic training and typed for this officer, and I didn’t want to do it. At Fort Polk, they wanted me to sculpt a couple of tigers out of Styrofoam, and I could have done that. [laughs] Maybe that would have been great, but certainly I wouldn’t be sitting here with you, my wife wouldn’t be there, and our daughters wouldn’t be there. There’s no telling. Maybe I’d be dead by now. No one knows. It always amazes me. Just that one moment.  

Candace Walsh (opens in a new tab) is a former editor of El Palacio. Currently, she is an assistant professor of creative writing at Central Washington University. Walsh holds a PhD in creative writing from Ohio University and an MFA from Warren Wilson College. Candace has worked on staff at Condé Nast International, Mothering Magazine, and as the managing editor of New Mexico Magazine. Her writing has appeared in numerous national and local publications. Walsh is the author of Licking the Spoon: A Memoir of Food, Family, and Identity (Seal Press 2012), a 2013 New Mexico – Arizona Book Awards winner, and two of the essay anthologies she co-edited were Lambda Literary Award finalists: Dear John, I Love Jane and Greetings from Janeland.

Daniel Barsotti (opens in a new tab) has been a professional photographer for over thirty years, making pictures for corporate clients, national and international magazines, cultural institutions, social service organizations, non profit foundations, museums, and art galleries. His studio is located in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Herbert Lotz was born and raised on a small farm town in Illinois and drafted in his third year at the School of the Art Institute of Chicago where he studied photography. He served as a radio operator in Vietnam in 1968 detached to the 25th Infantry Division at Cu Chi, the experience of which was to affect him the rest of his life, not unlike so many others of his generation. Driving into Santa Fe from the north passing by the National Cemetery in 1970, Lotz felt he had found his new home but still struggled to deal with his wartime experiences. In 1981, Lotz finally came to terms with his experience and continues to work with the photographs he took in Vietnam.

Peter BG Shoemaker is a Tbilisi-based writer and frequent contributor to El Palacio on conservation matters.

Positioning an Institution

BY CODY HARTLEY

What is now Santa Fe is one of the old places in a region inhabited for at least 12,000 years. Traces of those who have gone before can be found across this ancient and sacred landscape.

(more…)

Dr. Cody Hartley is the director of the Georgia O’Keeffe Museum in Santa Fe, New Mexico. His Ph.D. dissertation, completed in 2005, focused on Santa Fe and the creation of the Museum of New Mexico. Prior to settling in Santa Fe, Cody worked at the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, the Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute in Williamstown, Massachusetts, and the Santa Barbara Museum of Art. Hartley earned his MA and PhD in art history from the University of California, Santa Barbara.